1:05:04playstation and switch would be sony and nintendos doing but the steam version why yeah
1:05:06My PS3 version remains uncensored
1:05:06No reason whatsoever, considering that the PC playerbase is older on average
1:05:06Should we care about pippa's VA's opinion?
1:05:07they censored the art book on steam as well
1:05:08it doesn't really make sense, Pipps
1:05:10it used to be very aggressive
他
1:05:10If it was just the mobile version no one would care
1:05:10I paid for that stupid artbook, don't censor stuff years after you sell it reeee
1:05:12no reason to revoke dlc that was paid for, either.
1:05:13Clearly Skullgirls is as graphic as Sengoku Rance. Just release a patch.
1:05:14Because they're ideologically opposed to the material so they want an excuse to remove it
1:05:15Yeah Steam doesn't really care.
1:05:15Because all versions were censored and they had to
1:05:15iirc they took away paid content from those who bought it when they censored the game too
1:05:15Or just make a separate version
1:05:17keeps asset management simpler
1:05:20If I’ve already paid for the game, it isn’t moral or fair for them to change the product I’ve already paid for.
1:05:22They never needed to censor the Playstation version, the old one was okay.
1:05:23SkullGirls have lo9se there edge
1:05:26The censorship should have been optional if they genuinely just wanted to let younger gamers play
1:05:27Because they hijacked the game from the original creators and hate the fans, so much so didnt they go and censors the artbook?
1:05:32right, so its purely on the devs for being puritanical
1:05:32It's a different battle system.
1:05:35is the mobile version even still a fighting game?
他
1:05:35The mobile version is T-rated, steam is t-rated, xbox, switch, and ps is t-rated also.
1:05:35They also gutted the artbook they sold online
1:05:35yeah, simpler asset management/development
1:05:38people get weak and fold like the west has
1:05:38sony is quite puritan itself
1:05:39Again, shut down the company.