3:07:20Do the people in chat not realize everything was a broadcast back then? If not on a physical tape, it was a broadcast
3:07:20cable tv different from broadcasted stuff. That's why hbo can have nudity
3:07:20 time to bonk the rabbit chat
3:07:22It's not content based thats for broadcast
3:07:23Getting one guyd:_pippaSmug:
3:07:24Wait then how does hbo and like game of thrones work? Isn’t that cable?
3:07:25This means the FCC can regulate certain aspects of that content, but not the content of broadcast channels or “access” channels over which the cable operator has no editorial control
3:07:28FCC did not have oversight on most of that stuff till after 2010
3:07:29Yeah. Nobody who was alive to remember TV agrees that the internet is more censored than TV.
3:07:30Cable definitely was under their jursdiction, thats why safe harbor law exists
3:07:34I need my oshi to become a highly paid telecom lawyer as a joke.
3:07:36both sides are wrong right now, it's a really complicated manner
3:07:38Wikipedia, the ever stellar source material
3:07:38they are involved but not as a censor
3:07:40i actually trust wikipedia on this one.
3:07:40Those commies at Wikipedia are WORNG
3:07:47it regulated cable tech, not content
3:07:47they used to have say in cable at least. Not so much paid channels
3:07:49involved doesn't mean regulate
3:07:51content vs pricing, not the same
3:07:51Ah Yes, the 80's, back when Omeggle wasnt dead!
3:07:53@cipher8390 Can I give her a hug ?