2:44:201 so long as the company doesn't go under and I lose my job and the benefits
2:44:20generally, I'd imagine workers preferring 2 even if 1 is actually better for them
2:44:25if i'm really poor, 1 would do more for me
2:44:33Would make it into a company town
2:44:342 would mean nothing without 1.
2:44:38Investment in infrastructure and services > better pay in a dysfunctional economy
2:44:41if the company dies the workers will have money
2:44:44@callumunga5253 it's being hoisted by the government money
2:44:48I mean, if people need food, they'd need coin
2:44:49What happens to your company provided housing if you get laid off?
2:44:502 but I would just save up money and move as soon as possible so I'm not a good person to give money to
2:44:572, personally, but 1 furthers your goals
2:44:592 would help inject money into the economy by boosting consumerism
2:45:012 can be used to buy all of 1 in private ownership
2:45:03would go for 2 and leave the rest to other companies
2:45:062 doesnt mean better access to the good that 1 is providing
2:45:08people like to believe they're better with money than they really are
2:45:082 sounds nice but ultimately empty. 1 allows the workers more access to what theh already earn
2:46:23You can't be afraid of the people
2:46:27*looks at pickle* yes, it IS a pickle