1:26:14Unless the brand is a red herring
1:26:34I think I see what it's asking. It's just worded poorly
1:26:49:_reineItsfine::_reineItsfine:
1:26:59This is confusing to me too :_reineItsfine:
1:27:09The same cigarettes in Bonnie photo and in Ida's bedroom?
1:27:13does the crime scene mention the cig burns on ida's feet?
1:27:20:_reineItsfine::_reineItsfine:
1:27:34Reine, you checked the cigarettes, but you checked appearance, not testimony
1:27:55feels like it should be cigarettes but what statement is the question.
1:28:17We need testimony that someone smoked at Ida's, not just the fact that someone smokes in general
1:29:34The item in question should be at Ida's crime scene?
1:29:47Yeah the bedside table just tells us Ida's cigarettes were found
1:29:50we're still stuck on this one huh
1:30:13:_reineGws::_reineHeart::_reineHeart:
1:30:15I think this is both genuinely hard but also confusingly worded
1:30:30:_reineMonch::_reineMonch::_reineMonch:
1:30:42Killer be like: "Hey, I leave cig buds near the bodies, but I want Ida to be different, so although I did, in fact, smoke at Ida's, I didn't leave the buds at the crime scene", does it make sense?
1:31:14:face-purple-wide-eyes::face-purple-wide-eyes:
1:31:44:_reineItsfine::_reineItsfine:
1:31:46:_reineItsfine::_reineItsfine::_reineItsfine:
1:31:54:_reineBadlang::_reineItsfine::_reineItsfine:
1:31:54It's not about Bonnie at all, it's the statement that someone smoked at Ida's place
1:34:13:_reineBigO::_reineBigO::_reineBigO: